DND 5th Edition

Im mostly using this thread as a way to track progress as I go through each UA to ensure we have its contents up on the wikidot (thank you very much cotteneyenoh for the checklist <333 http://dnd5e.wikidot.com/forum/t-14715608/errata-checklist), since yeah, I find having a discussion forum helps with me tracking my work.

First up out of order is UA warlock and wizard's Eldritch Invocations, which we dont have, despite having the ravenqueen warlock from said UA.

Though, I'm thinking with this, since there are about 60 Eldritch invocations at present on the wikidot, and there are 20+ invocations in this UA, that I feel I'm going to start by migrating the current UA invocations to a /warlock:eldritch-invocations-UA link, so as to better distinguish them, and then link the UA ones in the top of the warlock page, and then someone with front page perms can add them below the warlocks Archived UA section

edit: Oh! And this does actually open up the window to creating similiar pages for Homebrew invocations from the list of homebrew creators we list. Same goes infusions too I believe, meaning I might add an equivilant page, since I know that Exploring Ebberon had a couple of infusions in there

Thats the eldritch invocations complete. Ill leave discussion about whether to apply that to infusions to something ill think of a little later, or if anyone does bring up their own thoughts on it.

Next up with things to add was UA4, waterborn adventures, which had the Krynn Minotaur, which is now on both the regular minotaur race page, and has a lineage page here: http://dnd5e.wikidot.com/lineage:minotaur-krynn-ua, which ill also throw onto the regular lineages page

Unearthed arcana 6: Ranger, which has the Ambuscade ranger, which is a sort of early attempt at the later on seen Revised ranger that we saw later on down the line, with a heavy emphasis on summons. Though, this was abandoned very early on, only ever getting up to level 5.

http://dnd5e.wikidot.com/ranger-ambuscade-ua
http://dnd5e.wikidot.com/ranger-ambuscade-ua:guardian
http://dnd5e.wikidot.com/ranger-ambuscade-ua:seeker
http://dnd5e.wikidot.com/ranger-ambuscade-ua:stalker

For UA quick characters, https://media.wizards.com/2016/downloads/DND/UA_Quick_PCs_SFG.PDF, Ill leave this one as well for discussion, since I think maybe? we add it, since it fits sorta alongside what the heroic chronicle section is? Though, its not for backstory writing, just for straight character creation. Miscelanious section? Part of the UA section? Idunno, just putting it here to have it be something I can think about i guess

And from UA 23:Druid, heres a variant/optional rule to make druids learning wildshape forms have a bit more depth, http://dnd5e.wikidot.com/wild-shape-forms

Id place it categorically along the same lines as the spellpoints rule, but, the Misc section is for published content, so where this would go is debatable

So few things…

1. Ambuscade Ranger has been added to the archived UA section of the main page.
2. Wild Shape Forms, I renamed it slightly to druid:wild-shape-forms-ua and cleaned up the coding behind the scenes, had tabs everywhere instead of spaces lol
3. For the UA quick characters, we can certainly add that to the section for Heroic Chronicle, maybe rename that section to Guided Character Creation or something like that? What do you think?
4. I'm not sure if or where to add the Wild Shape Forms or UA Invocations on the main page. I'm hesitant to put them under the main class section, but the archived UA is mostly set up for subclasses, not class features. I'll think on that, see what I can come up with.

Thanks for all the work NCat!

Lets see.

1. Thanks for putting Ambuscade up there
2. Ah, thanks for fixing up wild shape forms, yeah my coding continues to be rather rough, and I sometimes leave the tabs in when I transfer stuff in from the PDF's, ill make sure to avoid those being there in future.
3. Yeah, I think that would be good, having it as "Guided Character Creation"
4. I think just listing them in the same bullet points as the subclasses would be ok? Since, thats what is done for the rangers alternate versions of itself (with then its own subclasses dropped in in sub-bullet points)?

Thanks for helping with the code and frontpage Fred!

Heres that UA quick characters: http://dnd5e.wikidot.com/quick-characters-ua

Alright, thing to bring up.
So, along the way of double checking, ive mostly been ignoring subclasses and such that have similiarly named ones, however, today I made this page: http://dnd5e.wikidot.com/monk:kensai-ua, due to the fact that I feel that this UA version of Kensai is different enough from the print kensai to make it worth having a page for.

So, with that, I've decided ill probably give a double check over everything ive already checked to triple check, this time for how different a subclass is from ones we already have, since for an example we have on the website: Soulknife rogue. Soulknife UA, Soulknife UA revised, and Soulknife tasha's are all very similiar, but they are all different enough to warrent the seperate pages.

So yeah oops, there goes me having to recheck most things ough